Bug tracker: next steps

[Michael Sperber]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

> Hans de Graaff writes:
>
>  > So looking through all the feedback it seems to be that only roundup and
>  > bugzilla may qualify for the set of requirements that have been thrown
>  > around, and from those roundup seems to be the most favored one.
>
> The most important requirement cannot be satisfied by any software.
>
> Do we have a human who is willing to commit to making sure that
> somebody pays attention to the tracker for say the next 2 years? (That
> doesn't mean they have to do it personally, or for the whole period,
> but they do have to take responsibility for finding people to do it.)

You mean the admin side or looking at the bugs?  The admin side isn't
me, but I'll sure look at the bugs.  From experience, I know I'd much
rather do that than periodically browse through 3-year-old e-mails.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla