Bug tracker: next steps

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Hans de Graaff writes:

 > So looking through all the feedback it seems to be that only roundup and
 > bugzilla may qualify for the set of requirements that have been thrown
 > around, and from those roundup seems to be the most favored one.

The most important requirement cannot be satisfied by any software.

Do we have a human who is willing to commit to making sure that
somebody pays attention to the tracker for say the next 2 years? (That
doesn't mean they have to do it personally, or for the whole period,
but they do have to take responsibility for finding people to do it.)

If we don't have that, why bother?