GPLv3 packages (was multi-line colorization)

[Vin Shelton]

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
> Mike Kupfer writes:
>  > Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>  >
>  > > It's also hard to build up much enthusiasm for losing sleep in order
>  > > to condense about 100kB of ChangeLogs into release notes when AFAIK
>  > > there are no patches in the queue that require a GPLv3 XEmacs before
>  > > they can be applied.
>  >
>  > Where are we with respect to GPLv3+ packages?  I have a newer version of
>  > Gnus in my queue, which I haven't done anything with because it's
>  > GPLv3+.  Can I move forward with it, or do I have to wait for the
>  > license change for the core code?
>
> To the extent that these are *XEmacs* packages, probably you should
> wait.  OTOH, there already *is* a GPLv3 program that uses the packages
> by design (SXEmacs).  So it may be OK if you say it's for use with
> SXEmacs.  Ask the FSF copyright clerk or a lawyer. :-(

Stephen -

Isn't this exactly the round tuit you requested????

Please make a GPL3 release.

  - Vin