xemacs vs emacs

[David Kastrup]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

> David Kastrup writes:
>  > "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
>
>  > > agree that it's friendly.  Of course neither is happy that the
>  > > combination of Apple's IP and FSF policy make a merge impossible,
>  > 
>  > I don't see that "Apple IP" plays much into this if at all.
>
> Huh?  If Mac OS X were free software, the merger would be difficult
> (because of UI guideline issues) but not impossible.

I don't get your point.  Windows is not free software either and Emacs
runs on it just fine.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum