xemacs vs emacs

[Robert Widhopf-Fenk]

On Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 02:27:41, Stephen Turnbull wrote:
[...]
> better editor == good for free software, but there are many cases of
> conflict, and they are always resolved politically.  The example of
> DSOs has already been mentioned, while the recent decision to use
> bzr for the future version control system of Emacs was made by a
> person who is totally ignorant of distributed version control
> (Stallman) and in the face of extremely serious performance
> problems.)

So you say, they did no testing and just decided to use bzr,
too bad I like those threads where projects were discussing
and testing which DVS to use after cvs/svn.

Have performance issues with bzr been the reason why the
XEmacs developers have chosen hg?  Didier said it was only
discussed on the internal mailing list.

Robert.