[issue] Tracker procedures [keywords=+has doc]

[FKtPp]

--- "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:

> I really appreciate the efforts of several people in picking out
> issues and updating the tracker.
> 
> There are some procedural issues I'd like to clarify.  Don't worry
> too
> much about "conforming" exactly to procedure, but I would like to
> make
> some suggestions to make the tracker as useful as possible.
> 
> (1) An issue should not be closed until you've confirmed that the
>
> [...]
>

Sorry for bring so many inconvenience to you, I'll be very careful and
obey your suggestion next time I updating the tracker.

> (That doesn't mean you need to be able to
> write it in English!)  If you find yourself doing this more than once
> or twice, consider nominating yourself for XEmacs Reviewer.  (No
> joke,
> we always need more reviewers!)
> 

What is a XEmacs Reviewer? What they did to help XEmacs' development?

> (5) Keywords are important!  Some keywords are workflow-related, the
> "has X" and "needs X" keywords in particular.  The "has X" keyword
> means that such an item has been contributed, typically by the
> issue's
> creator, and needs to be confirmed before committing the change.  The
> "needs X" keyword means that such an item must be developed and
> committed to resolve the issue.  The "has X" and "needs X" keywords
> are *not* opposites.  When a contributed X is verified and committed,
> the "has X" keyword should be removed.  Similarly, when an X is
> developed and committed, the "needs X" keyword should be removed.
> 
> Other keywords refer to XEmacs behavior, and are helpful to users in
> filtering out issues unrelated to their problem.  At present, I've
> created the following keywords for general areas of XEmacs behavior:
> display, i18n, input/output, motion, performance, search, and
> security.  Feel free to add more if appropriate, but as mentioned I'd
> like to keep the number small for now.  Try to keep new keywords at a
> pretty high level of generality.
> 
> Currently a majority of the keywords are tracker-related; I'm
> thinking
> about how to get them out of your face, but for now please bear with
> that.
> 

Thanks for your clarification~~

Thanks,
FKtPp


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ