sync auctex 11.84: good news.

[Uwe Brauer]

>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

   > Mats Lidell writes:
   >> Hi Uwe, You wrote:
   >> 
   Uwe> What exactly is the state of art. Can Mats submit that
   Uwe> Xemacs.rules patch?
   >> 
   >> I think I need to produce a patch with better documentation for it to
   >> be accepted. Maybe also look at it again to see whether it can be done
   >> in a better way.

   > I think the best thing at this point is to just get the whole thing
   > into CVS where people and the Package Build Smoketest can easily look
   > at it.  As long as you CVS tag the current state, it's trivial to
   > recover by reverting the changes.

That all looks reasonable to me. However I prefer if the Xemacs.rules
patch is applied before I submit the big auctex patch.

Uwe 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xemacs.org/pipermail/xemacs-beta/attachments/20080130/7232a548/attachment.pgp