flyspell mode not buffer local?

Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Jan 5 02:28:17 EST 2008


Tim Connors writes:

 > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

 > > Unfortunately, Debian's policies concerning this kind of stuff
 > > are a compromise, and in this kind of case they don't work very
 > > well with XEmacs.

 > I understand why they backport things, but do you know why they decide to 
 > link in the flyspell.el into both the emacs and xemacs trees, when both 
 > the emacs (emacs22-el and emacs22-common) and xemacs (xemacs21-basesupport 
 > and xemacs21-basesupport-el) packages have their own versions?

No, that sounds like a genuine bug and a violation of Debian's Emacs
policy.

 > > I'll try to remember to put "sync flyspell" on the TODO list.
 > 
 > I am a little confused.  On a Centos 4 machine where I have not been able 
 > to break flyspell at all, the flyspell.el is dating from 2002.

Well, obviously somebody thought flyspell needed some changes since
there's a fairly large diff from 2002 to 2007.  If you can't break
the 2002 version, don't worry about it (unless we break things by
syncing).

 > http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.emacs.xemacs/browse_thread/thread/15c106b449ef6e61/695d087c22202a47
 > The reporter obviously never solved that bug, instead getting a 
 > self-consistent version of the sumo instead of debian's version.  Despite 
 > being basically the same file in Centos4, the button-2 fault does not 
 > appear in it.

Sounds like Debian has other patches somewhere that cause the problem.

 > So I installed flyspell.el (v 1.7n) from 
 > http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/Manuel.Serrano/flyspell/flyspell.html 
 > and it seems to be working perfectly on debian, it having overridden the 
 > version in xemacs21-basesupport, and of course the one in 
 > dictionaries-common.  That's where I am now -- using upstream's 1.7n 
 > version on debian, and am not going to touch the Centos4 machine until it 
 > breaks:)

Nice to know.  Sounds like you are set, and like we can update to a
much more recent version without causing anyone too much pain.

Thanks for the followup, and a happy, productive 2008 to you!




More information about the XEmacs-Beta mailing list