[PATCH] Abstract out a display-table-specific API (2)

[Mike Kupfer]

>>>>> "ST" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

ST> This code should be introduced in two places.  First in the
ST> mainline, second either in 21.4 core (which will take longer, viz
ST> the fact that Vin hasn't weighed in on changing `make-autoload' in
ST> 21.4), or in packages.  I think package-future.el is safest.

I was thinking about this some more, and I think there's still a missing
piece.  Or maybe it's just my lack of Lisp expertise showing.

Anyway, package-future.el fixes up the compile-time environment, but are
those defuns going to be available at runtime on 21.4 systems?

mike