[PATCH] Abstract out a display-table-specific API (2)

[mike.kupfer at xemacs.org]

>>>>> "ST" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

ST> Mike, although CVS has a lot of problems, its merge capabilities are
ST> not much worse than any other system 

That's damning with faint praise in my book (I've been spoiled by using
Teamware for the last 15+ years :-)).

ST> However, my advice would be to keep a private Mercurial (or other
ST> modern system) repository.  

Yes, an excellent suggestion.  I'll want to think about how to manage
the patches (i.e., use Mercurial Queues or not), but Mercurial in some
form is definitely the way to go.  (I'm using Mercurial in my day job
and am pretty comfortable with it.)

Thanks!

mike

PS. Am I the only person getting bounces for Uwe?

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<oub at xemacs.org>
    (reason: 554 <oub at ucmail.ucm.es>: Relay access denied)