[PATCH] Building packages with 21.4
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Dec 22 18:16:07 EST 2007
Michael Sperber writes:
> I think this is too messy, and too confusing. I'd rather just factor
> out the names of the special operators---just like you did---and add
> the more exotic operators to a file in xemacs-base. We'll have to patch
> 21.4 once, but I think that's acceptable.
Norbert has already objected explicitly to the claim that patching
21.4 is a solution, and I suspect Vin doesn't like it much either.
Unless you can persuade both of them, it's definitely *un*acceptable.
As I wrote, we *can* patch 21.4, too, and I think it's a good idea.
But this is not going to stop here, I bet. There is a huge amount of
new syntax, some of it quite gratuitous, in recent GNU Emacs, and I
really really doubt this is the last time we're going to need to patch
21.4 for a package synch.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list