Poll: is ~/.emacs auto-migration worthwhile? Or too dangerous?
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Fri Oct 5 01:06:20 EDT 2007
David Kastrup writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
>
> > SL Baur writes:
> >
> > > There are exactly 0 valid usages of it and an apparently infinite number
> > > of harmful ones.
> >
> > Nonsense.
>
> Isn't the purpose of a poll _getting_ rather than _pushing_ opinions?
Depends on how you define "opinion", of course. To the extent that
Steve is saying "I think automigration sucks" in a rather implicit
way, it's an opinion and to the extent that I have anything to do with
changes to the automigration code (including removal) I'll take it
into account.
But as a fact, he's wrong; I provided a counterexample. There are
valid use cases.
As for my personal opinion, I didn't much like it what I first saw it,
and I still think that any code that trusts Custom to DTRT in edge
cases is setting up users for a big fall. OTOH, I think automigration
has helped to reduce the incidence of the FAQ as I described it,
though it's anybody's guess as to how much.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list