Bug tracker: next steps

Adrian Aichner adrian at xemacs.org
Fri Sep 7 06:59:41 EDT 2007


"Vin Shelton" <acs at alumni.princeton.edu> writes:

> On 9/7/07, Michael Sperber <sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>>
>> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
>>
>> > Hans de Graaff writes:
>> >
>> >  > So looking through all the feedback it seems to be that only roundup and
>> >  > bugzilla may qualify for the set of requirements that have been thrown
>> >  > around, and from those roundup seems to be the most favored one.
>> >
>> > The most important requirement cannot be satisfied by any software.
>> >
>> > Do we have a human who is willing to commit to making sure that
>> > somebody pays attention to the tracker for say the next 2 years? (That
>> > doesn't mean they have to do it personally, or for the whole period,
>> > but they do have to take responsibility for finding people to do it.)
>>
>> You mean the admin side or looking at the bugs?  The admin side isn't
>> me, but I'll sure look at the bugs.  From experience, I know I'd much

I'll do both to some extent.

Adrian

>> rather do that than periodically browse through 3-year-old e-mails.
>
> Amen, brother.  :-)
>
>   - Vin

-- 
Adrian Aichner
 mailto:adrian at xemacs.org
 http://www.xemacs.org/



More information about the XEmacs-Beta mailing list