[Bug: 21.5-b28] w3 fails on font-spatial-to-canonical

Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Aug 5 11:12:03 EDT 2007


Aidan Kehoe writes:

 > The size isn’t even that useful; XFT DPI is independent of that for server
 > side fonts, though it will often be close. I find myself also forgetting to
 > run xrdb -DXEMACS_XFT ~/.Xdefaults before starting an XFT XEmacs. 

I don't understand what you mean by "independent of that".  I perceive
a big difference between
-adobe-courier-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-m-100-iso8859-1 and
-adobe-courier-medium-r-normal--34-240-100-100-m-200-iso8859-1.  If
the user has specified a 24pt font in .Xresources, we should respect
that.

We currently don't have a way to respect that spec on Xft AFAIK, but
it's one of the things I work on off and on.  I see no reason why we
shouldn't allow any of the various font specs on any platform,
although in cases of ambiguity we should prefer different defaults for
different platforms.




More information about the XEmacs-Beta mailing list