[comp.emacs.xemacs] Re: M-x shell fails under Windows Vista
Aidan Kehoe
kehoea at parhasard.net
Fri Apr 20 10:25:43 EDT 2007
Ar an fichiú lá de mí Aibréan, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
> Aidan Kehoe writes:
>
> > I’ve made a log of all the file accesses that installed XEmacs makes on a
> > -vanilla start available here:
> >
> > http://www.parhasard.net/xemacs/filemon-xemacs-startup-20070420.log.gz
>
> Did you observe 11 requests for media?
No, and nothing appeared to be unrelated to my system. But then I’m on XP,
not Vista--Sean, if you can run Process Monitor:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/utilities/processmonitor.mspx
and examine what files XEmacs tries to load on starting, then send us a list
of them, that would be really helpful.
> If not, and you don't have an e: drive, maybe it would be possible to
> alias e: to a removable media device, remove the media, and see if you
> can correlate accesses with Windows bitching.
I have an E: drive, and it’s empty right now.
> (ISTR from the Win2k fiasco that if you don't have a drive at all,
> Windows won't complain. It's only for a drive with removable media, and
> the file doesn't exist on that medium, that the complaint pops up.)
>
> This suggests a possible workaround for Sean: rename the offending
> device.
>
> BTW, I gather that your opinion is that since help looks in DOC for
> source file names, your patch has nothing to do with this? (Just to
> confirm, since you're the expert.)
Unless some of the startup Lisp tries to find the C source of a function or
variable, I can’t see how it could.
--
On the quay of the little Black Sea port, where the rescued pair came once
more into contact with civilization, Dobrinton was bitten by a dog which was
assumed to be mad, though it may only have been indiscriminating. (Saki)
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list