Followup: Re: Releasing the Emacs guided tour into the public domain; also, video

[Phil Sung]

On 4/14/07, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
> I think it's preferable for Phil to maintain a canonical version under
> "all of the above"...

I agree. At least until I figure out whether (and how) GNU Emacs would
ship a wiki-modified version, I'd be willing to maintain an
ok-for-GNU-Emacs version.

On 4/13/07, Jason Spiro <jasonspiro4 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Will the FSF need copyright assignment for small edits?  For large
> edits?  How about the licensing issue:  will the modified material be
> only GFDL as opposed to tri-licensed?

Presumably if we had a dedicated wiki for this, we could require that
contributions be tri-licensed (just as Wikipedia requires that
contributions be GFDL'd). But the FSF would still want copyright
assignments in either case if it were going to ship a wiki version, so
I think using Wikimedia is just fine now.

--Phil