Changes in font locking

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

David Kastrup writes:

 > _After_ looking up the XEmacs history.  You conveniently forget this
 > little detail time and again.
[...]
 > Which was becoming plausible just after checking the XEmacs history.
 > Which you conveniently forgot.

I don't know when Ralf did the checking, but the posting order seems
to be the reverse, by about 8 hours.

Message-Id: <87ps7cmich.fsf at neutrino.caeruleus.net>
Message-Id: <87veh4n5cq.fsf at neutrino.caeruleus.net>

 > I should hope we could do better than that, but I am afraid that you
 > are able to convinve me otherwise time and again.

In the light of the above, it seems much of the convincing takes place
in the privacy of your own skull.  The mistake about the timing is
surely an "honest" mistake, but to make such a defamatory statement
*twice* without checking (a curious omission, given the frequency with
which you demand message-ids from me) clearly demonstrates your
conviction of impregnable righteousness.

I take my leave of this thread.