[PATCH] (Draft3) Make X11 server-side fonts and Mule suck less.
Aidan Kehoe
kehoea
Mon Nov 6 22:54:38 EST 2006
Ar an c?igi? l? de m? na Samhain, scr?obh stephen at xemacs.org:
> Aidan Kehoe writes:
> > -; ;; Subsets of Unicode.
> > -
> > -; #### what is this bogosity ... "chars 96, final ?2" !!?!
> > -; (make-charset 'mule-unicode-2500-33ff
> > -; (make-charset 'mule-unicode-e000-ffff
> > -; (make-charset 'mule-unicode-0100-24ff
>
> I've seen these in the wild, please don't remove them just yet, unless
> you're moving them to iso10646-1. But I don't see anything like that.
They?re already commented out--they?re just commentary on GNU Emacs?
approach to implementing Unicode. I?ve replaced them with a clearer
description of GNU?s approach and how ours differs.
> Also, if you're going to generate huge hunks like those in
> specifier.c, it's a perfect time to reformat the whitespace. Pretty
> please?
I did an indent-region on the file, then restored the docstrings to where
they were initially. There are a few changes that resulted from that, but
not many--hopefully I didn?t miss the reformatting you wanted.
Anyway, as you many have deduced, I?ve committed that change. Comments on
incompatibilities and reports of bugs it introduces are encouraged.
--
Santa Maradona, priez pour moi!
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list