[PATCH] (Draft3) Make X11 server-side fonts and Mule suck less.

Aidan Kehoe kehoea
Mon Nov 6 22:54:38 EST 2006


 Ar an c?igi? l? de m? na Samhain, scr?obh stephen at xemacs.org: 

 > Aidan Kehoe writes:
 >  > -; ;; Subsets of Unicode.
 >  > -
 >  > -; #### what is this bogosity ... "chars 96, final ?2" !!?!
 >  > -; (make-charset 'mule-unicode-2500-33ff 
 >  > -; (make-charset 'mule-unicode-e000-ffff 
 >  > -; (make-charset 'mule-unicode-0100-24ff 
 > 
 > I've seen these in the wild, please don't remove them just yet, unless
 > you're moving them to iso10646-1.  But I don't see anything like that.

They?re already commented out--they?re just commentary on GNU Emacs?
approach to implementing Unicode. I?ve replaced them with a clearer
description of GNU?s approach and how ours differs. 

 > Also, if you're going to generate huge hunks like those in
 > specifier.c, it's a perfect time to reformat the whitespace.  Pretty
 > please?

I did an indent-region on the file, then restored the docstrings to where
they were initially. There are a few changes that resulted from that, but
not many--hopefully I didn?t miss the reformatting you wanted. 

Anyway, as you many have deduced, I?ve committed that change. Comments on
incompatibilities and reports of bugs it introduces are encouraged. 

-- 
Santa Maradona, priez pour moi!


More information about the XEmacs-Beta mailing list