related to an XEmacs BTS

[stephen at xemacs.org]

Mats Lidell writes:

 > Anyway, seriously, what I think is missing is an easy way to find
 > what bugs or issues there are.  If it is easy to get an overview of
 > the bugs they might get fixed because it is then possible to pick a
 > bug and fix it.

I suppose it's worth a try.  However, if we make any serious effort at
entering outstanding reports, say from the last year, I'll bet we can
easily get a couple hundred issues.  We are going to need workers to
enter the issues, classify and prioritize them, identify duplicates,
link issues to relevant mailing list threads, and close fixed, bogus,
or unfixable issues.

Would anybody like to do that?  People who volunteer to do that work
get two votes on the choice of tracker. :-)