[Bug: 21.4.19] Crashed in Gnus
Eric D. Hendrickson
edh at mr.net
Wed Apr 19 13:59:01 EDT 2006
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
> Note that it's an assert ... that means that it's a policy decision by
> the people who wrote the interpreter. I presume it was their judgment
> that this is a sufficiently bizarre event that they couldn't think of
> a reasonable defensive action to take to stabilize XEmacs. Eg, if the
> stack or the Emacs code itself got smashed by some wild pointer bug,
> then you're in big trouble anyway.
yes I see. true...
> That's unlikely to work properly, unless you can reproduce exactly the
> architecture and optimization flags used by the package. I don't
> think it's worth the effort.
Actually I did find a debuginfo package (thanks Ville!) [it's not in a
yum repository but I found it on rpmfind] but I agree, I don't think
it's worth the effort.
If it happens again after I remove gnus from site-packages, I'll come
back to this and get more info for you with an unstripped binary.
Best regards,
--
Eric Hendrickson Albedo Applications, Inc.
http://www.crystalcave.net/~edh/ edh at mr.net
Don't anthropomorphize computers. They don't like it.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list