[Bug: 21.4.19] Crashed in Gnus

Eric D. Hendrickson edh at mr.net
Wed Apr 19 13:59:01 EDT 2006


"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

> Note that it's an assert ... that means that it's a policy decision by
> the people who wrote the interpreter.  I presume it was their judgment
> that this is a sufficiently bizarre event that they couldn't think of
> a reasonable defensive action to take to stabilize XEmacs.  Eg, if the
> stack or the Emacs code itself got smashed by some wild pointer bug,
> then you're in big trouble anyway.

yes I see.  true...

> That's unlikely to work properly, unless you can reproduce exactly the
> architecture and optimization flags used by the package.  I don't
> think it's worth the effort.

Actually I did find a debuginfo package (thanks Ville!) [it's not in a
yum repository but I found it on rpmfind] but I agree, I don't think
it's worth the effort.

If it happens again after I remove gnus from site-packages, I'll come
back to this and get more info for you with an unstripped binary.

Best regards,
-- 
Eric Hendrickson                           Albedo Applications, Inc.
http://www.crystalcave.net/~edh/                         edh at mr.net
       Don't anthropomorphize computers. They don't like it.




More information about the XEmacs-Beta mailing list