[PATCH] Re: another break caused by changes in easymenu
Michael Sperber
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu Jan 5 14:09:49 EST 2006
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea at parhasard.net> writes:
> as it was originally is clearly wrong. In the true branch of the (if ...)
> statement, reversing easy-menu-all-popups is a waste of time, because its
> length is zero. Michael added those lines on 2001-04-12, and there’s no
> ChangeLog entry for why.
Just for the record---I didn't. I committed the change, but that was
as part of the Great Trunk Move. I've tried to investigate, but I'm
not sure what you mean with "those lines." The (reverse
easy-menu-all-popups) was already in revision 1.1.
-------------- next part --------------
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list